Pack of 3 Kodak 145 1855 Professional Portra 800 Color Negative Film (ISO 800) 35mm 36 Exposures 4.5 out of 5 stars 52. Comparing it with other Kodak color negative films, I’ve found Portra 160 to have too little saturation, Portra 800 to hav… I had heard a rumor that Portra 800 was going to be discontinued? The grain is now even finer than ever before. I bet you’ve had some cracking results! It has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 800/30° along with a notable underexposure latitude for effectively pushing to ISO 1600 with maintained quality and extended highlight and shadow detail. In these conditions, the film’s warm color balance shined, producing natural tones and warming up the cool evening shadows nicely. Kodak Portra 800 tests of m42 and Pleiades - posted in Film Astrophotography: Here are two test shots of M42 and Pleiades. Specifically, as I’ve already mentioned, I found myself particularly impressed with the level of grain, and that despite the lower resolution and contrast of the lens, I could also see that the film was pretty “sharp” too. Read Kodak Portra 800 – A Review […]. For now, some Portra 800 on order, in both 35mm and 120! My first go has been with Lomo 800 (which I think might be Kodak of some variety) which I have so far enjoyed very much. You need to put some thought into why you’re shooting it to get the most out of it. Klassenbester Unterbelichtungsspielraum. Kodak Portra 800. Den har svært fine korn, noe som gjør den velegnet til scanning og digital etterbehandling, samt som grunnlag for større forstørrelser. Im Portra 800 Test sollte der Sieger bei allen Eigenarten abräumen. I’m not really sure what made me decide to load a roll of it and shoot it in daylight originally, but I’m really glad I did. Now, this really isn't a critism of the film, so much as something you have to be aware of. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_7',185,'0','0']));eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_8',185,'0','1'])); Importantly, at least as far as my workflow goes, I didn’t find myself needing to correct colour-shifts much between frames, which to me was a good sign that Portra 800 could hold up to at least a bit of variance in exposure within my workflow without it causing me a headache in the scan and in post. I also found the results out of the Noritsu to be quite impacted by the slight yellowish-orange cast this scanner is quite well known for. I might have to shoot some Portra now and see how it compares. eval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'35mmc_com-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_20',192,'0','0'])); eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'35mmc_com-mobile-leaderboard-2','ezslot_21',193,'0','0'])); At the beginning of this post I mentioned that I’ve recently committed to only shooting Kodak Ektachrome E100 and P3200 for at least 6 months to learn how to get the best out of those films. Generally speaking, for mid-day shoots, I would stick to Portra 160 or Ektar 100 which are far better suited to bright shooting conditions and are much, much less expensive. https://jamesmadisonphotography.com/2019/09/19/review-kodak-portra-800 Well, that’s enough encouragement for me ;-), I will write something about my experience with it then. Like most color-negative stocks, Portra 800 benefits a fair bit from overexposure. However, unlike Fuji Pro 400H, which needs to be overexposed by at least a stop for best results, I had no problem shooting Portra 800 at box speed with just one notable exception. Features I’d be interested to do that comparison in my workflow too. Languages. That grain, of course, is the result of the film's relatively high ISO performance, which at 800, is arguably one of the film's biggest strengths and weaknesses. Najostrzejszy wysokoczuÅy negatyw 36-klatkowy, rodzaj 135. Understanding how to expose in lower-light and how to scan properly can reap much better results in my experience… but anyway, that’s a rant for another day. I was still getting the hang of my Noritsu scanner and so hadn’t felt entirely comfortable deviating from my usual choice of film. Alternatively, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko-fi: kofiwidget2.init('Support Me on Ko-fi', '#46b798', 'D1D0KHG8');kofiwidget2.draw(); Learn about where your money goes here. Like most color-negative stocks, Portra 800 benefits a fair bit from overexposure. Alex favorite film is the Kodak Portra 400 NC and he loves it so much, unfortunately they stop to product and he bought as many as he could to keep his stock safe. Buy this film online â 35mm | 120 In reality, I can’t think of a single image I’ve taken with this film that I’ve even negatively contemplated the grain in the final image. Hereâs my version of Kodak Portra 800. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I can’t remember exactly, but I suspect I might have decided to load a faster film to counteract the effect or also using a slower lens in the winter months. Mamiya press 65mm lens on the fron, I’ve got this 18mm f/8 pancake lens on loan from, I’ve just published a review of the Pentax ME Su, Me and Chris from @skyllaneyoptomechanics have bee, I’ve just shared an article about a recent exper, Kodak Ektar 25 – Urban/Rural Decay in the Texas Panhandle – by Andrew Morang, Ilford HP5 vs Kodak Tri-X – Finding My Go-To Black & White Film – by Aukje, Own Your Workflow and Goals (and don’t get too distracted by the mantras of others), https://emulsive.org/reviews/blind-film-review-01-fuji-natura-1600-vs-kodak-portra-800-vs-lomography-color-negative-800-35mm, Kosmonauts: Anna Lisa Wagner - Kosmo Foto, Fujichrome Velvia - Expired & Developed in Rodinal - By Lee Griffith, Leica 35mm f/2 eight-element Summicron and Leica M240 - Candid Portraits - By Steven Bleistein, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. A while back, I wrote a review of Portra 800 and focused on shooting at different exposure indexes. I like the slightly more subtle rendering of Portra 400 in bright light. You’re currently viewing this page in English. $44.99. I’d have used Portra 800 instead! It has warm tones, very good exposure latitude, and while its grain is more noticeable itâs still very pleasant looking. Finally, you can find a load of my photos taken with this film hereeval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'35mmc_com-narrow-sky-1','ezslot_28',194,'0','0'])); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: 35mmc is free to read. Cheers, As such, I then subsequently didn’t shoot Portra 800 for nearly a year. Producent KODAK ; Opis. In some ways, Portra 800 is a bit redundant considering Portra 400âs exposure latitude covers nearly all of Portra 800âs effective range. The big question of course is if Portra 800 is worth the extra cost. As I’ve mentioned a few times throughout this post, it’s also incredibly versatile. Few film stocks have a more dedicated following, and thus …, Fuji Pro 400H is a lovely professional film stock that is prized for its classicFuji colors, breathtaking skin tones and wide dynamic range. 1 2 Next. Kodak Portra 400 Test Fazit. I’ve also heard that Portra 400 pushes quite well, rendering images with less overall grain than Portra 800. Many people consider Portra 400 (and Fuji Pro 400H for that matter), to be âboringâ film stocks with no punch or bite to them. At this stage, it was quickly dawning on me that Portra 800 could be the film that might offer me the greatest level of versatility and the lowest level of requirement to tinker with the results within my workflow. In many ways, Portra 800 is more reminiscent of Kodak’s consumer stocks, like Kodak Gold 200 or Ultra Max 400, than it is of its Portra siblings. WiÄcej informacji. As I’ve written about before on this website, slight overexposure is good way to cheat your way to good results provided the film has the capacity for it. And because I’m not a massive bokeh-fiend, and don’t find myself with a desire to shoot much in the way of shallow depth of field photos in daylight, but do enjoy the versatility of being able to shoot colour film in low light, this pretty much makes it the ideal choice for me. I will still keep shooting Portra 400 and Ektar. Of course that is personal, but to me it is. Kodak Portra 800 tests of m42 and Pleiades - posted in Film Astrophotography: Here are two test shots of M42 and Pleiades. It was cheap, and you could find itpractically anywhere. Kodak's Portra 800 35mm is designed to be a high-speed film with accurate color reproduction and natural skin tone in low-lighting conditions. This is a fast film, and that means grain. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Se spotÅebitelskými problémy vám poradíme na Äísle 299 149 009 každý vÅ¡ední den od 9 do 17 hodin. We usually sell film in single rolls at our shop. This is unfortunate as Portra 800 has a truly unique look compared to its slower siblings, producing images with warm, vivid colors and strong contrast at the expense of a little extra grain. KODAK PORTRA 160. In this month’s roll review we find out. I talk more about my colour film workflow here, but I mention this now to highlight the point that there are a lot of variables within the process of shooting film, so really all you’re about to read amounts to is a review based on how I personally shoot and have processed this film. While Portra 800 has excellent dynamic range, at box speed, its high contrast means you have to be careful not to lose shadow detail. Even knowing what I knew, it felt slightly unnatural using this film for sunny-day landscapes type shots. I’d really like to see what you do with it – looking back, I wish I’d known about it sooner. BOTTOM LINE: Shoot Portra 800 with your camera or meter set at ISO 500. I will still keep shooting Portra 400 and Ektar. I choose the labs I use for their consistent results, I use my scanner in a specific way and apply fairly subtle process to my scans in Lightroom all to achieve results that I am happy with without too much fuss. Najbardziej wysokoczuÅy negatyw typ 135 -36 klatek o czuÅoÅci ISO 800/30 º , o dużym nasyceniu barw, wysokim kontraÅcie, maÅej ziarnistoÅci. CineStill 800T sells for between $13 and $16 a roll, but If you’re looking for a budget option, and you don’t need the consistency and dynamic range of a professional stock, Lomography Color Negative 800 can be had for about $9 a roll or about $28 for a three pack. With the SLRLounge Lightroom Preset System weâre able to quickly edit and retouch photos in Lightroom without ever having to go into Photoshop. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_13',188,'0','0']));eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_14',188,'0','1'])); A couple of rolls later I decided I should give Portra 800 a run for its money in lower light. Published with, You've successfully subscribed to Rambling Polymath. I love the softness I can get with Kodak Portra 800 shot indoors at low light. MateriaÅ ÅwiatÅoczuÅy charakteryzujÄ cy siÄ neutralnym nasyceniem barw. Note: because these images were scanned, it is difficult to say how much of what we’re seeing here is actually film grain and how much is noise introduced by the scanner. In this video I'll be taking you through every image I took (aside from a few family pics). You can change your language preferences any time you like — just select your language from the dropdown list! This is particularly true when shooting during golden hour. Unfortunately, I did get a little merry, so can’t remember exactly the exposure index at which I shot these, though they were at least 1 if not 2 stops underexposed, and more significantly I didn’t push process the film. This one is going on my bucket list for sure. Gold 200 was a staple in my household. Film: Kodak Portra 400 Trending Recent Popular. Its really great to read about your experience with Portra 800 as I’ve been using Portra 400 exclusively, rating it at 100 with results I’ve been really happy with. Youâre currently viewing this page in English. Took me back to shooting Fujicolor 800 on the F4 in the late 1990s. I’m working on that, I promise. See more ideas about portra 800, kodak portra, kodak. But despite being a member of Kodak's legendary Portra family, the 800-speed variety often gets overlooked in favor of Portra 400 and 160, which are arguably more versatile, and critically, less expensive. Keep up to date with all things Lomography! All Right Reserved. They stock Portra 800 here, but also supply something like 200 other films making the website interesting to explore as well as purchase from. How have you found the lomography stuff? Indoors, Portra 800 is another story altogether. As time went on, I found that I would be in agreement with them. I Shot a Roll of Ektachrome E100 by Brian Agnes. Pretty noisy. In fact, for one reason or another, Portra 800 is the colour film that seems to have best responded to how I work, and has given me the most confidence that I will get results that I like over the widest range of shooting conditions. Steve, I’m trying to resist breaking my self imposed rule and buy some 120. It has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 800/30° along with a notable underexposure latitude for effectively pushing to ISO 1600 with maintained quality and extended highlight and shadow detail. Argueabley the best part of Portra 400 is the color palette. As a rule, I find that prefer the colours out of consumer films such as Ultramax 400, but I don’t really get on with the higher grain and reduced sense of sharpness I’ve had out of those sorts of films when I’ve shot them in the past.
Découpage Syllabique Phonétique, Une Romance Inattendue Pdf Ekladata, Taille Renaud Capuçon, Padlet Anglais Collège, Vue Eclatee Tracteur Tondeuse Massey Ferguson, Demande Annulation Amende, Chihuahua Couleur Bleu, Bac Svt 2014 Amérique Du Nord, Patron Doudou Nin-nin,